🌏 You can expect more positive climate coverage from Ours to Save over 2022, with a deeper focus on video and visuals. As always, the best way to support us is by becoming a paid subscriber. This will ensure we can keep publishing forward-thinking environmental journalism. 🌏

Subscribe now

🚯 Resistance is mounting over this billion-pound incinerator project

Residents of Edmonton, London are fighting back against dirty air and environmental inequality. By Florence Wildblood.

Londoners may have heard a particularly dystopian warning on the tube and in the news this week. The Mayor of London issued a high pollution alert for Tuesday to Thursday this week, commenting:

“Toxic air is extremely dangerous for Londoners - and I'm doing everything in my power to tackle it.
“This is particularly important in order to protect those who are more vulnerable to high pollution."

Image courtesy of Tom Page, edited, CC BY-SA 2.0.

London’s toxic air led to 1, 700 asthma hospitalisations during the 2017-19 period. And indeed, Sadiq Khan has made dealing with air pollution a key feature of his tenure as mayor.

However, several very polluting projects are unfolding under his watch. One of these is the Silvertown Tunnel, which we covered last year. As reported in gal-dem, hundreds recently protested against the £2.2B, 1.4km, four-lane tunnel, which is set to be built in the Newham area of London. Newham is the most polluted borough in the UK.

Ours to Save

This London neighbourhood is caked in dust. Why is nothing being done about it?

Situated on the eastern edge of London, adjacent to the Thames, Silvertown has long been an industrial area. It takes its name from S. W. Silver, who established a rubber factory there in the 1850s. In more recent years it has housed chemical plants, the city’s principal docklands, and the largest sugar refinery in Europe…

10 months ago · 2 likes · Florence Wildblood

Another, less high-profile one is the redevelopment of the Edmonton Incinerator. The North London Waste Authority is hoping to build a new, larger incinerator on the site, which has been operating for around 50 years. It’s suggested that this would emit 700,000 tonnes of CO2 via the burning 700,000 tonnes of waste, per year, for decades – in a particularly diverse and deprived area of London.

On Tuesday, Iain Duncan Smith MP tweeted to say he’d written to Michael Gove, secretary of state for Levelling Up, regarding the plans. His letter reads:

‘I believe this is a case of serious mismanagement of public funds, with grave consequences for public health and the environment, in a time when we are being advised to move away from methods of waste disposal with high carbon emissions such as incineration.
The proposals are also almost universally opposed by local residents.’

Duncan Smith’s letter is the latest development in what has been a loud and proud resistance campaign. Spearheaded by these local residents, Stop the Edmonton Incinerator has co-ordinated innovative direct action.

Edmonton Incinerator. Image courtesy of Nico Hogg.

Last month, the group’s spokesperson Sarah Eastwood went to court for withholding council tax. She is, according to the most recent announcement, one of 32 people across 7 London boroughs refusing to pay the sum anticipated to go towards the incinerator.

The organisation is also encouraging people to fill out this survey into rubbish and recycling in North London, to paint a better picture of the extent of opposition.

The results are set to be published ahead of the UK local elections on May 5th. It is hoped that it will provide a people’s mandate for councillors to supercharge recycling, reuse and composting – and reduce incineration.

The NWLA maintains the Incinerator is ‘the best environmental, technical, and economic solution to the treatment of waste in north London’. Construction work is set to begin this year.

Visit Stop the Edmonton Incinerator’s website and Twitter for more info.

Share

🤑 Profiting off panic: new green regulation creates a wild west

ESG reporting is becoming mandatory for all businesses as part of the push for net-zero. This investigation reveals overcharging and greenwashing at the heart of this new market. By Florence Wildblood.

Image courtesy of Calvin Kan on Unsplash.

The pressure is on for businesses to be more transparent about their emissions, pay gaps and ethics. As is to be expected, a new cohort of ESG (environmental, social and governance) consultants have arrived on the scene – promising to help them get there.

But what if these businesses, which facilitate the measurement and management of ESG data, were actually standing in the way of long-term sustainability?

Over the past few weeks, our editor Florence has taken a deep dive into the ESG reporting sector, surveying participating businesses and subject-matter experts, for Maddyness. She found that, with competing regulatory standards, frameworks, and advice, the space is a minefield for businesses hoping to do the right thing.

Read the full story

Subscribe now

👋 See you next week!

Ours to Save

High pollution alert: Londoners campaign…